Tuesday, July 5, 2011

Casey Anthony Found Not Guilty


The big news of the day is that Casey Anthony was found not guilty of all of the significant charges levied against her (murder, aggravated child abuse, and aggravated manslaughter), leading the social media world into a tizzy. Listen, I don’t pretend to know all of the facts, and I haven’t a clue what my outlook would be if I were on the trial, and I was forced to look at things based on the concrete evidence and without all of the biases (intentional or not) that you come across with the media.

And truth be told, many famous court cases that have been considered lucrative or “slam dunks” are actually viewed pretty inaccurately when you look at the facts. For all of the people who chastise the McDonald’s coffee lady, saying that it’s ridiculous to sue for coffee being hot, many of them probably don’t realize that McDonald’s served their coffee at a substantially higher temperature than other establishments and that over 700 people had suffered burns of varying degrees from McDonald’s coffee over a ten year period. This woman, who was nearly 80 years old, suffered third degree burns and had to undergo skin grafting. And even the Michael Jackson/child molestation case strongly suggested that the family of the young boy in question had a criminal history (and future) and had behaved in a suspicious and unusual manner. So I certainly understand that things are not always as clear cut as they appear.

However, what I do know is that when I look at that infamous photo of two year old Caylee, lying in bed with her cheek resting on her hand, my heart absolutely breaks. This young girl – still a baby, really – was taken from the world and I don’t feel like her death got the justice that it deserves. Even if we give Casey the benefit of the doubt here, and we believe her story, her death still went unreported for over a month. And what’s the result? She was found guilty of misleading police. Please.

Sure, the evidence was circumstantial, but the circumstantial evidence was still pretty overwhelming. This is a woman who did something wrong. Perhaps we’ll never know if she murdered her daughter, or if her parents helped her cover it up, or if her father did abuse her, but there’s no doubt in my mind that she did something that she’s not paying for.

I don’t believe Caylee Anthony received justice. And that’s a tragedy.

2 comments:

Kyle Litke said...

Agreed.

The problem is there was significant evidence to show something was up. We know for a fact she lied to police because the story she told them was not the story they went with in her defense. First she told people they were just staying with friends, then Caylee was with her "nanny" (who didn't exist), then when confronted she claimed the nanny kidnapped her, then finally after the body turned up changed it to "Oh she died by accident and we were scared". Clearly something was up, and she was found guilty of lying.

Beyond that it's tough to say. Do I think Casey killed her daughter? Yes I do. But I don't know that it was proven beyond a reasonable doubt that there was intent to kill her. I think she did, especially considering how she acted in the 30 days after (partying, etc...I mean, even in the "best case" scenario for her, her daughter was accidently killed the day before...it's not like she was partying and thought her daughter was being watched by someone). But did the prosecution prove that? I don't know that they did.

They interviewed one of the alternates (the regular jury members didn't comment as far as I'm aware), and he essentially said he agreed with the verdict and said the prosecution didn't prove their theory of what happened (and if they didn't prove their theory, then there's reasonable doubt), and that they didn't believe Casey's father on the stand (and if they didn't believe him, well, his testimony is, as far as I'm aware, the only hard evidence that went against Casey's story of the events, although there was some circumstantial evidence that couldn't really be substantiated).

I didn't follow the case well enough to really be sure what was said, what the prosecution brought in and didn't bring in. The way she acted and the fact that she absolutely lied about it makes me think it's at least negligent manslaughter or aggrevated child neglect...if it was truly an accidental drowning there's simply no good reason why she couldn't have called the police and reported the death. But it seems like it was too difficult to actually prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it happened the way the prosecution said.

It's unfortunate that Caylee doesn't get justice, I wish she had, and like you said, it seems pretty clear that Casey did something wrong, but we may never know exactly what.

Also glad you brought up the McDonalds case. I cannot stand when people bring that up as a frivolous law suit and mock her for suing because her coffee was hot. Actually looking at the case shows McDonalds was absolutely in the wrong.

Matt Basilo said...

Thank you, Kyle, for echoing how I feel in a far more eloquent way.